How is this different from asking a general AI to write my R&D narrative?

The drafter writes to your jurisdiction's exact filing structure (US Form 6765 Section G, Canada T661 Lines 242/244/246, UK CIRD, Australia R&DTI core activities), enforces published word limits where they exist, structures the systematic investigation as a hypothesis-experiment-result-conclusion ledger, and cites only the artifacts you actually paste, building an audit trail rather than inventing evidence.

Is this a filed document or tax advice?

No. It is a drafting aid that produces first drafts to be reviewed and completed by a qualified adviser using your full facts and contemporaneous records. Confirm all figures and eligibility with the administering authority.

Grounded AI · agentic

R&D Documentation Drafter

The write-up is where R&D claims are won or lost, and it is the part engineers dread and consultants bill most for. Paste your projects and engineering artifacts and get a filing-ready pack: per-component technical narratives in the exact structure your authority expects, a hypothesis-experiment-result-conclusion ledger, and an audit trail that cites only the evidence you actually provide.

Drafting aid, not tax advice, and not a filed document. Narratives are first drafts to be reviewed with a qualified adviser and confirmed with the administering authority. Not sure you qualify yet? Start with the eligibility analyzer.